Now, it must be said, this liturgical diversity was at one time much broader still in periods such as the middle ages comparative to the post-Tridentine church, but within the post-Tridentine period while the Romanizing tendency was certainly in great evidence in response to the Protestant Reformation and its rejection of "Roman claims", so too was a respect for legitimate and historical expressions of liturgical diversity also concurrently found; something expressed quite clearly by St. Pius V in his bull, Quo Primum.
Fast forward to the post-conciliar period and we've unfortunately seen the advent a paradoxical situation where, at one and the same time, we have the loss of these historical expressions of legitimate liturgical diversity -- a liturgical flattening if you will, with most of these historical liturgical books of the religious orders and primatial sees substantially disappearing -- combined with a rather chaotic approach to the post-conciliar Roman liturgical books themselves. In a sense we have the inverted situation from what we saw in the era of St. Pius V, with traditional historical expressions disappearing and, whether officially or unofficially, liturgical novelty and chaos either favoured or at very least tolerated.
This commentary aside, one of the historical liturgical expressions that can be found is that of the Cistercian rite. The Cistercian liturgical books, expressed in the Missale Cisterciense and Breviarium Cisterciense, itself has undergone various liturgical developments over the course of its history, and the photos shown here represent the liturgical books as expressed after the reforms of 1647. (Prior to this, there was a greater divergency between the Roman and Cistercian liturgical books). In that regard, what we are looking at amounts to a fairly "Romanized" form of the Cistercian rite it must be noted.
The Cistercians are, of course, known for their relative austerity, and one of the features of their liturgical tradition which you will take note of in each of these photos is the absence of metal altar crosses in favour of wooden one's. (The late 17th century Cistercian rituale also directed that the feet of the corpus should be higher than the candlesticks proper, but as you will see from these photos, this was by no means universally observed.)
Another point worth noting is that at one time the usual six candlesticks we are so accustomed to now, were not used in the Cistercian rite, but here again eventually the more typical Roman usage would come to pass, and in addition, two large "standards" (or candelabra magna) were also adopted, being lit from the Sanctus until the Communion. (The use of standards are also seen within the Carthusian rite.)
The Chanting of the Gospel |